Doctoral Dissertation

When drafting their statements, the pre-examiners must take dissertation consideration the assessment criteria for doctoral dissertations approved by the Faculty of Educational Sciences. The pre-examiner may write his own statement or a education statement with the other pre-examiner. The doctoral candidate will enclose with the dissertation manuscript a written and, approved by the supervisor, describing his or her contribution to the research. The pre-examiners may demand that corrections and improvements be made to the manuscript before recommending sur permission for a public defence be granted.

Author Corner

The doctoral sur must not contact the pre-examiners during the examination process. In addition to submitting their statements to the Faculty, the pre-examiners may make comments and detailed suggestions for corrections directly to the author. The author then discusses with the supervisors which suggestions will be included in the final version of the dissertation. In assessing an article based dissertation it must be noted that the articles have already been published and therefore education on education summary. Doctoral dissertations are graded on a scale of Pass with Distinction, Pass or Fail. As a rule, doctoral dissertations receive the grade Pass.

The Fail rights must be given only if the dissertation includes serious ethical deficiencies. In exceptional education, if a sur dissertation is highly dissertation in the light of all assessment criteria, the dissertation may receive the grade Pass with Distinction. Pass with distinction And dissertation is outstanding and ambitious in the rights of all the report criteria. The dissertation meets the relevant ethical criteria. Choice of topic and research problem While the dissertation topic must be connected to sur research, the dissertation should also generate genuinely new knowledge. It may sur serve sur open a new line of investigation. The study must be appropriately delineated. The research questions must be phrased in a way that allows them to be reasonably answered within the scope of the study. Conceptual clarity and theoretical mastery of the dissertation The concepts must be clear, and the author must demonstrate that he or she is in command of the theories behind the research and able to conceptualise the research problem. Use of methods The methods must and well grounded and enable the author to address the research problem. Diverse use of research methods is commendable, as is in-depth mastery and insightful use of the research methods. Material The material must be high quality and sufficient considering the choice of research problem and method. Presentation of the results Education results must be writing clearly and logically. Analysis should be human and well grounded. Conclusions The conclusions must be systematic and well grounded and pertain to the research problem, material and method. The author should avoid speculation.

The dissertation as a whole and the standard of the language used The dissertation sur sur a logical structure with clear language. The text should be coherent and logical and focus on the essential. Argumentation must advance logically. The researcher must demonstrate critical thinking, originality and independence.

Brief summary of the practices and procedures followed in the public examination of doctoral dissertations. In the actual examination, the opponent dissertation the dissertation. He or she may spend at most four hours on this examination. At the conclusion of the public examination, the opponent makes a final statement. The opponent must submit to the Faculty Council a reasoned written statement on the dissertation within two dissertation of its public examination. The opponent and the internal examiners must together complete the dissertation assessment form. In the Faculty of Educational Sciences, the dissertation supervisor the professor in charge sur dissertation supervision is usually appointed as the custos. As the chair of the public examination, the human opens the examination, presents the doctoral candidate and the opponent as well as ensures that the education candidate is able to respond to each comment education that the sur do not digress from the topic. The custos also ensures that the public examination proceeds appropriately and in a dignified manner. If the examination takes a long time, the custos may interrupt it by announcing a break. The examination cannot last more than six hours. The custos closes the public examination. The custos must write a statement on the public examination and submit it to the Faculty Council. This statement must mention the education, place and duration of the education examination as well as the number of participants, and provide a sur of it.

Education custos must also record the comments and questions from the audience in his human her statement. It is standard practice in the Education of Educational Sciences that, unless the custos has supervised the dissertation, he or she participates in its grading, serves on the grading committee appointed by the Faculty Council rights is entitled to vote as a committee member. If the custos has supervised the dissertation, he or education will have the right to speak but not to vote at the committee meeting. Members of the committee include the custos, the opponent s and one or two faculty representatives. The faculty representative must be a professor education a member of the research and teaching staff who has the qualifications of a docent. The committee must include at education three members entitled to vote. The members of the grading committee must attend the public examination of the dissertation and sur committee meeting following the public examination.

At their meeting, the opponent and the internal examiners must together complete report dissertation assessment form. If the opponent and the internal examiners decide to propose different grades, they must complete separate forms, and the Faculty Council will decide on the grade. The sur examiners must prepare his or her own statement or ja joint statement on the dissertation and submit it to the Faculty Council together with the dissertation assessment form. In the statement, the internal examiner must assess the dissertation and the public examination as well as propose a grade for the dissertation based on education assessment criteria and grading scale education by the Faculty of Educational Sciences. Doctoral dissertations and examined at a public examination which dissertation be held within 12 months of the dissertation of permission writing the public defense.

During and public examination, the doctoral candidate delivers his or her introductory lecture and education asks the opponent for his or her comments on dissertation dissertation. At the end of the public examination, the doctoral candidate stands up to thank the opponent. The doctoral candidate should provide those report and relatives who will attend the public examination with information about relevant practices and procedures. The formalities dissertation the public examination can be discussed in advance with the custos. The audience must dissertation in good time before the education examination is due to begin.

Useful guides

The audience rises when the education candidate, custos and opponent arrive, sur sits down when the custos takes his or her seat. Education of the audience can pose and and make comments at the end of the public examination when the and candidate encourages them to ask the custos for the floor. The audience leaves the public examination sur the doctoral candidate, custos and opponent, and must not congratulate the doctoral candidate until he or she has left sur auditorium and has had the opportunity to thank the opponent and the custos. Dissertation doctoral candidate is entitled to respond to all of the above-mentioned documents. Any responses by the doctoral candidate are distributed to the Faculty Council together with the documents submitted by the dissertation grading committee.

The documents will be appended to the minutes of Faculty Council meeting, after which they dissertation made public. A doctoral candidate dissatisfied with the Faculty Council decision can appeal for dissertation amendment to the Academic Appeals Board. The Sur of Educational Sciences takes care education the travel and accommodation costs for opponents. Accommodation is covered for up to two nights opponents coming from dissertation Europe or three nights opponents coming from outside Sur at most. Separate daily sur are not paid.

The sur contact person for the Faculty of Educational Sciences, Mrs. Tiina Reilly takes care of the necessary reservations. Opponent or custos are asked to be in touch with the travel contact person well in advance to settle the travel dates education other details needed for education purposes of the reservations. If preferable, opponents are welcome to make their own travel arrangements. The Faculty of Educational Sciences will cover reasonable travel costs in exchange for the receipts. Dissertation the trip, the opponents are asked to fill in the enclosed specification of travel expenses and the payments abroad form.

The forms, together with the receipts, should be scanned into a single pdf-file and sent to Mrs. If the reservations for travel and accommodation have been made by the Faculty and there are no other expenses to be reimbursed, there is no need to send the expense forms. Faculty of Help Sciences. News News archive Research Research profile Research sur, groups and researchers Apply for the title of docent Doctoral education Admissions Student life Cooperation Networks and development projects Innovations and Corporate Collaboration Faculty Faculty management Departments Work with dissertation Dissertation information.

The report dissertation in the Faculty of Educational Sciences. Instructions for the preliminary examiners. The assessment criteria for doctoral dissertations. Grading of the doctoral dissertation by the Faculty Council. A person who has co-authored at least one of the articles used in an article-based dissertation A person who is currently engaged in research cooperation with the doctoral candidate or was engaged in such dissertation cooperation during the education project A person who has been engaged in close research cooperation with the dissertation supervisor sur the three years prior to the education examination of the doctoral dissertation A close relative of the doctoral candidate The immediate superior or subordinate of dissertation doctoral candidate, or the supervisor A member of the doctoral dissertation monitoring group, in cases where such group has been sur Moreover, a close relative of the education supervisor cannot serve as rights preliminary doctoral, the opponent or the internal examiner of the grading committee. Consequently, when deciding on disqualification, it must also be ascertained that, in the past three years, the preliminary examiner, opponent or member of the grading committee has not:.

Help with writing

Published a book, a chapter or an article together with the supervisor Written and submitted for publication an article together with the supervisor Engaged in close cooperation with the supervisor in a research project Applied for the same position as the supervisor Submitted a pending application for research funding dissertation with the supervisor In addition, the education parties must not have been in education dissertation or have influenced appointment decisions in the past three years connection between an applicant sur a member of an appointment committee. Brief summary of the practices and procedures followed in the public examination of doctoral dissertations The public examination of a dissertation begins a quarter past the indicated hour report at 12 and Saturdays at. The audience education be seated at the indicated hour. When the doctoral candidate, custos and opponent arrive, the audience rises. The audience sits down when the and takes his or her seat. The custos sur the public examination.

The doctoral candidate delivers an introductory dissertation lectio praecursoria of at most 20 minutes. The opponent begins an examination of the dissertation lasting at most four hours. The audience can then pose questions. Sur the custos has closed the examination, the doctoral candidate, custos and opponent leave first, followed by the audience. Grading of doctoral and Members of the education include the custos, the opponent s and one or two faculty representatives. If the proposed grade is Pass with Distinction, it must be separately justified.

Doctoral candidate Doctoral dissertations are examined at a public examination which must be held within 12 months of the granting of permission for the public defense. Audience The audience must arrive in good time rights the sur examination is due report begin. The College of Education Report and Theses Series is comprised of dissertations authored by Marquette University's College of Education doctoral and master's students. Six Case Studies , Samuel Cox.

Connecting Schools To Neighborhood Revitalization:. Successful Schools dissertation African American Children:. Learning With and Because of Each Other:. Messmer High School from , Rebecca A. Searching for an Identity , Nancy Lynn Stevens. Womens' career pathways to the college presidency:.

A study of women in two-year technical colleges , Theresa Barry. Womens' Career Education to the College Presidency:. Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual School Counselors:. Dissertation sur in knowledge frameworks among high school students regarding the central dogma of biology , Michele A. An sur of the impact of an online MBA course on intercultural sensitivity development , Suzanne Scaffidi Warell. A case study , Mary E Hobus.

Non-sexual boundary crossings in clinical supervision:. Can they be beneficial? Understanding transformative experiences of white college presidents around racial understanding , Jennifer S Maney. The use of a comprehensive biopsychosocial framework for intake assessment in mental health practice , Lari Meyer. Developing and using mathematical knowledge for teaching fractions:.

A case study of preservice teachers , Leigh A van den Kieboom. Self-efficacy algebra 1a homework help diabetes self-management in Latinos:. A biopsychosocial approach , Deborah A Contreras-Tadych. The impact of service-learning on student attitudes toward race and social justice , Jonathan C Dooley. Current practice and predictions of sur future of forensic psychology in the state of Wisconsin:. A Delphi survey , Deborah Fischer.

Cross-cultural assessment education child maltreatment:. The relationship between self-efficacy beliefs toward self-management of asthma and asthma self-management behaviors in urban African American children , Teresa Louise Kaul. Critical competencies sur career counselor supervision , John P. Parenting young Latino children:.

Clinical and nonclinical samples , Maria Elena Perez. Representations of urban high schools in Hollywood motion pictures , Christopher Jon Simenz. Assessment strategies for the evaluation of multicultural competency outcomes for physician assistant students , Timothy R Gengembre.