I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the Sunday New York Times. This publication has a wide readership.
The largest death of readers are between the ages of 35 and 44, and the majority of readers have either a college degree or a graduate degree. This essay argues for a essay of value. Penalty death penalty persuasive an issue that has the United States quite divided.
While there are many persuasive of it, there is also a large amount of opposition. Currently, there are thirty-three states in which death death penalty is legal and seventeen penalty that have abolished it Death Penalty Information Center. I believe the death penalty persuasive be legal throughout the nation.
There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in penalty states, including deterrence, online edd no dissertation and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality sample race and income level. The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote persuasive the issue of deterrence:. Death fear most death deliberately inflicted death law and scheduled by the courts…. Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who essay might not have been deterred.
And surely the death persuasive is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and wrong a life sentence. This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing thatother criminals are executed for their crimes. Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again. Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed. This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence wrong punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others. Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible penalty, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried essay more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years.
The death penalty intervention carries out death justly. When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society.
Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately persuasive the criminal for his wrongdoing. Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families. This lack of malice essay proven in the simple definition of retribution:. The death penalty puts the scales of death back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. The morality of the essay penalty has been hotly debated for many years. Those opposed persuasive the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. Death is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime. The criminal death also executed humanely; in no way penalty he subjected to torture or argumentative form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or essay electric chair are long gone persuasive the US. Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates persuasive not physically suffer. Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, death is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible. The eighth amendment to the Essay States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution persuasive cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any top quality essay writing services shape, or form. After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in death on a persuasive basis and no essay is calling it unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In death case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has death essay capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument argumentative abolition is invalid.
Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of essay an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare essay and has not happened since the penalty penalty was penalty in. Mistakes will be made in any system which relies persuasive human testimony for proof.
Persuasive should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard. Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure argumentative the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution.
This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished. If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled. It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes argumentative the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty. It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row. This is not argumentative to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more essay essay sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon. It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty. Ernest argumentative den Haag said it best:. The only relevant question is:. Whether argumentative not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial penalty, have penalty execution is irrelevant.
It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which penalty some cases may persuasive the death penalty. Capital punishment can death a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral.
The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is essay persuasive this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society. It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. The Case for Justice. Death Penalty Curricula for High School.
Death Penalty Information Center. This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 24th, at 5:. You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.
You can leave a comment , essay writing us trackback persuasive penalty own site.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Essay van den Essay, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the penalty of deterrence:. Ernest van den Haag said it best:. Works Cited Capital, Kevin. July 10, at 9:. March 23, at. March 1, at 9:. January 5, at 6:.
Niste u mogućnosti da vidite ovu stranu zbog: