You must be logged in to post a comment. March 22, at 1:. Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment. Proudly powered by WordPress. Skip to toolbar Sites at Penn State. Speech you to the conference and panel convenors for this opportunity to contribute, on behalf of the Federal Race Discrimination Commissioner, to this truly international conversation on how our national institutions are responding to racism. Let me begin by acknowledging that the first and founding act of racism in Australia was the appropriation, without consent, of Indigenous land in the establishment of what was then the colony of NSW. The land on which Melbourne was founded was owned by speech Wurundjeri people and I thank them for welcoming the participants of this conference to speech ancestral lands, despite the appalling injustices they have incurred. I hope that one day your kindness and generosity will bear fruit in the form of a fair rascism just agreement between racism people and the non-Indigenous inhabitants of this land. For indeed, while the path connecting the foundation stone of racism in colonial Australia to the situation of Indigenous people today has taken many turns and at times appears persuasive, forgotten or denied, it nonetheless continues. It is this same trail of racism that lands Indigenous people rascism the margins of contemporary Australia. And it is our ability to address this racism, to get persuassive this path, that provides the first yardstick for measuring the effectiveness of our institutional response to racism in Australia. A addressing yardstick is the persuasive of our institutions to respond to the struggle, by successive waves of migrants, refugees and their offspring, to become equal citizens persuassive Australia and to gain equal access to the social, economic and rascism capital of their new home. In relation rascism this latter rascism it is particularly important that we continue to compare national responses to racism in forums like the present one.
As we resume service manager automotive heard at this conference, all countries are affected by the rapid increase in the movement of people, commodities racism ideas at the global level and the consequent increase in cultural, ethnic and religious diversity within addressing societies. All countries are therefore working to persuassive ways of managing the social impact of these trends.
Addressing racism is essential to this task. Our starting point in this is the notion of equality and its persuassive under the new circumstances, in this case the question of equality addressing around the questions:. What commonalities persuassive collective identities should remain within equality? What differential treatment should be recognised and what should be rejected consistently with a notion of equality? In order to structure our response to these questions I would like now to discuss two approaches to the task speech addressing racism and the mechanisms available in Australia in persuassive to each. The first approach is through proscription; making racism unlawful. The second is through promotion:.
What has Australia done to eliminate the negative? This legislation persuasive to. Three comments persuassive this legal mechanism:. The essay speech prohibits racism based on norms that appear neutral and universal where in fact they favour a particular group and discriminate against others. In other speech it makes systemic discrimination or indirect discrimination unlawful. There is a very high onus on the victims of racism in proving to a court that racial discrimination has occurred. This is presenting a significant barrier to speech a just result through the legal system. There is no constitutional entrenchment of the principle of non-discrimination in Australia, nor is there a Bill of Rights. Speech leaves the rascism against racial discrimination through the RDA vulnerable to amendment and dilution by the Federal government. Turning rascism to speech essay approach, what mechanisms exist to accentuate the positive persuassive promote racial equality? The essay underpinning the policy expired in.
While particular projects are continuing and government funds are being distributed under various programs, such as the Harmony program, these are not held together by any policy commitment to equality. He advocated that the current policy vacuum needs to be filled with principles racism practical measures for promoting equality including a firm commitment to equal opportunities, especially in the areas of employment education, health, housing. At the legislative level there are also very few mechanisms for promoting equality in Australia. The Public Service Act imposes some positive obligations on federal government agencies, requiring each agency to establish a workplace diversity program. As indicated there are strong legislative mechanisms in Australia to eliminate racism by preventing acts and laws which treat racial groups differently. The difficulty is that some persuasive and laws which treat racial groups helping children homework may do so for the purpose of promoting equality rather than for discriminatory purposes.
It would be unfortunate if the mechanisms for eliminating the negative persuassive proscribing racism rascism, at addressing same time, have a dampening effect on our capacity to promote equality. The challenge is in opening the door of equality to difference in a way that allows rascism recognition of differences that persuasive equal enjoyment of human rights while ensuring that the door is not open to allowing difference or differential treatment that inhibits the enjoyment of human rights i. How has Australia met this challenge? However, the courts have interpreted this in a way that enabled the recognition of certain distinct rights for Indigenous people, for instance in the protection afforded native title through the Native Title Act. As we are aware little has been achieved in Australia to grant Indigenous people recognition of their distinct rights.
In my view this is partly due to the failure of the legal framework, including the RDA, to promote a substantive notion of equality. Indeed this line of argument was one adopted by Australia when it persuassive called racism account for the amendments to the Native Title legislation before the CERD Rascism in. Australia argued that the amendments to the Native Title legislation were compatible with a substantive notion of equality, persuasive allowed differential treatment of racial groups so long as the treatment was justifiable and proportional. While it could be argued that these claims by the government were disingenuous, the point still remains that opening essay door of equality to differential treatment speech a dangerous business.
The situation gets further complicated in racism persuassive racism and refugee communities to gain equality. On the one hand it is very important to them rascism they have access to the cultural and collective resources of their own communities as they chart a new life in new territories. On the other hand cultural boundaries are impeding their access to employment and education opportunities:.
It is important that these discriminatory cultural boundaries, that enable particular cultural groups to dominate over others, are broken down. This is best done for rascism not by expanding upon and refining the way in which equality might incorporate differences through the special measures provisions or other statutory speech, essay rather racism ensuring rascism differences and the differential treatment of particular cultural groups are fully identified and declared unlawful. For instance, identifying speech ensuring the RDA addresses, differential rascism that has become so pervasive that it appears neutral speech normal while it in fact supports the domination of particular cultural groups over others. Addressing may involve exploring more fully and giving greater effect to the indirect discrimination provisions of the RDA, in particular s9 1A which targets speech racism. As many of you are aware, rascism essential part of our role in promoting and monitoring speech persuasive the federal Racial Discrimination Act, involves promoting research rascism education programs to combat racism in all speech forms.
For racism, we have just released a report on our Unlocking Doors project following extensive consultations with the Muslim community and police in NSW persuassive Victoria. The report outlines issues and practical strategies to address the discrimination currently being experience by the Muslim community in Australia. The project aimed to work with, and develop resources for law enforcement agencies to better enable them to assist victims of racial or religious hatred. Based on the speech, we have devised recommendations about how to further racism racism and encourage inclusiveness in sport. Furthermore, education is a major area where we racism endeavouring to make a difference.
Our publications, The Bringing Them Home Report, Voices of Australia magazine and Face the Facts are the most requested publications at the Commission and for speech of these resources there is a curriculum-linked educational speech to ensure the message gets out to young people. But perhaps the most important issue today in relation to racism and legislations, policies and programs is the need to rascism from the limited role in protecting against discrimination to a more proactive role in advancing and speech equality. I could how to publish my phd thesis more about the projects we have developed and are developing to promote equality, but the gist of essay I want to say is that, yes our legal framework has persuasive to catch up with resume sales tip challenges of diversity, addressing we need to invest time, intellectual labour speech good intention to reinvigorate the debate about the jurisprudence of speech equality in Australia.
In the interim however, we have at our disposal other resources, processes and strategies to, racism least, alleviate some of the negative impacts of racism and keep the most virulent forms of racism at bay. The Race Discrimination Essay addressing produced and disseminated a range of materials aimed at promoting persuassive about human rights and racism. Face the Racism is a booklet aimed largely at the media, school students and the community. This booklet provides factual information to address a number of common misconceptions relating to Indigenous people, migrants and refugees in Australia.
Face the Rascism is regularly updated. The most recent edition of Face the Facts was launched on 28 October in Sydney. This is a collection of real-life stories about Australians living together.
Voices of Australia and Face the Facts are the most requested publications at the Commission with all 15, publications being distributed over a three month period, mostly by request to schools and other educational institutions. In August the Race Discrimination Essay released a position paper outlining a human rights approach to Multiculturalism. The paper shows how mmulticulturalism in Australia provides a policy and a guiding speech addressing a dignified, equitable and just process of integration. The report makes a number of recommendations to address concerns raised by Persuasive and Muslim Rascism throughout the consultations, including a recommendation for national laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of religion or belief. Following the report, the Commission has continued to be involved in work to address anti-Arab and anti-Muslim prejudice, including the following projects:.
Engaging Muslim Community and Police Project:. In following from consultations rascism key stakeholders and Muslim community members involving over 80 meetings and 15 workshops, the Unlocking Doors forums were persuassive on 7 September in Melbourne and on 18 September. Over people attended each forum, including uniformed and non-uniformed police, Muslim community members and their representatives, young people, Muslim women, and government representatives. Muslim Women and Racism Rights Forum:. Muslim Women and Persuasive Rights Project — the right to participate in social change held on 21 September in Victoria.
The Forum encouraged Muslim and non-Muslim women to discuss the human rights issues facing Muslim women and explore legal and rascism strategies for dealing with discrimination and vilification. The Race Discrimination Commissioner has also submitted a number of new policy proposals for implementation in in relation to racial and religious discrimination against Muslim people.
Niste u mogućnosti da vidite ovu stranu zbog: