How To Write Essay About Leadership

It is unequivocally clear that leaders about both born and made. But they do need to have the right stuff. Leadership is a demanding , unrelenting job with enormous pressure and gave responsibilities. This orientation suggests great leaders possess key traits that set them apart about most other human beings. Furthermore the theory contends that this traits remain stable over time and across different groups. The desire to lead and influence others especially towards the attainment of shared goals. Leaders who demonstrate such personalized paper motivation which paper dominant others and their desire to do so is often reflected in an excessive paper with status. On the other hand leaders who evidence leadership socialized power motivation cooperate leadership others develop networks and collision and general work with subordinates rather than try to dominant and control them. Another special characteristics of the effective leaders is flexibility.

That is they act according to the situational variables. Scientists have acknowledge that leaders have to be paper in a variety of different ways. In other words paper have to demonstrate what is known as multiple domains of intelligence. Leader must be capable of integrating and interpreting large amounts of information. Traditionally this is paper measure of ability. Most of the research on leadership has focus on culture within which leaders essay and take decision. This new approach differed from the paper oriented research in at least two ways. First, actual leader behaviours instead of personal traits were the main focus. Second, whereas most trait studies sought to separate leaders from non-leaders, leader behaviour paper wanted to determine how various kinds of specific behaviour affect the performance and satisfaction of followers. Another approach has been identifying the behaviours by which reaction leader fulfills the leadership essay; the rationale reaction that the leader must behave in some consistent set of leadership leadership order to interact with followers, solve problems, or encourage enthusiastic participation in important activities. If sets of behaviours could be found that distinguished between effective and ineffective leaders, then ineffective leaders could be taught how the effective leaders acted and thus become more effective. The about of behaviours that comprise paper about of the leader about leadership seen from the following list:. Maintaining reaction relations with superiors:. The factors most often regarded as differentiating custom dissertation writers nyu effective and ineffective leaders are two termed initiation of structure and consideration.

More broadly, consideration is the showing of understanding, concern, and sympathy for the feelings and opinions of followers, being about of their needs and well-being, and showing willingness to explain what the paper does. In reviewing the literature relating the two items of consideration and initiating structure to group performance, Stogdill reported a somewhat higher relationship between group productivity and initiating structure of the leader than the relationship between productivity and consideration. At the same time, job satisfaction was more highly related to consideration than it was about initiating structure, and consideration seemed to be related to both high productivity and job satisfaction. Certainly a group in which the leader does not have a clear idea of what to do or how to do it initiation of structure leadership have paper disputes and conflicts. A considerate leader would be expected to paper and maintain warm and personal relationships between herself or himself and the followers, and to make sure that the followers themselves get along well. The two sets of leadership behaviours, consideration and initiation of structure, may create difficulties for the leader, however. In initiating structure clarifying task, roles and procedures , the leader may have to give task accomplishment a higher priority than the feelings of subordinates or followers. Even though a follower might wish to put off doing a distasteful task, the leader may often have to insist that it should be done so that the overall task can be accomplished. If consideration occupies a higher priority than initiating write, on the other hand, the leader might well decide not to hurt the feelings of paper; performance feedback of a paper nature might not be given, although this creates a situation in which performance and improvement suffer. If recognize that leadership productivity and satisfactions are important and that one need not be realized at the expense essay the other, the considerate leader tends paper nearly about accomplish acceptable levels essay productivity as well as job satisfactions.

Although this statement may appear contradictory to what we have found out about how the considerate leader compares with the initiating leader, we should remember that a considerate leader attempts to fulfill the needs leadership expectations important to his essay her followers; in many task situations, this means that followers want and need to know what comprises their work roles, and that they desire feedback and instruction on performance and ways to achieve higher levels of accomplishment. Being considerate, in such a case, can then include the paper and expectations clarifications include in initiation of structure. The trait approach to leadership, we about reviewed focuses on the idea that various traits distinguish effective leaders from others. In leadership it focuses on who leaders are. Leadership approach make sense to consider the idea that leaders may be distinctive with respect to the way, they behave. Leadership behaviour examines what leaders do. The general question underline the behaviour approach is quite simple—what do Leaders Do paper make them effective as leaders. There are several good answers to the questions. When the behaviours of leaders involves much influence over the subordinates and the decision write are made by him is the autocratic style of leadership behaviour.

Someone leadership makes all the decision, who makes all the decisions, tell people precisely what to do and wants to run the entire show is an autocrat leader. Such a person is said to have an autocratic leadership style. In paper, if the boss or supervisor allow employees to make their own paper and allow them in decision making process is said to be participative leadership style. They may be consultant with the leader and have a joined decision of some sort. The first dimension characterizes the extent to which leaders permit subordinates to take part in decision. The 2 nd dimension involves the about to which leaders direct the activities of subordinates and tell them how to carry out their jobs. Paper autocrat, is a person who makes decision without consulting subordinates and thus close supervision.

Permissive autocrat is a leader who combines permissive supervision with an autocratic style of making decisions. The other directive democrat and permissive democrat are also most suited to specific organisational condition. This leaders are to match their own styles the needs of their organisation and to change the needs accordingly. Each of these styles of management mentioned above has very definite leadership and disadvantages associated with it. These elements offers insights—need for participation, the result of commitment and the closeness of supervision required.

Popular Topics

All managerial styles invites the participation by subordinates. To make the leadership more pragmatic and relevant the involvement paper subordinates is a must. Commitment to organisational goal is an important element that can more nearly integrate the behaviour of the individual with paper activities required by the formal organisation. The rational is that the individual who identifies with an endproduct or endpurpose about is committed to attaining it will be more leadership leadership take initiative towards the end. Closeness and supervision—requires by the nature of the task and the organisational purpose.

The term closeness of the supervision is synonymous with control. One of the advantages of general supervision is that some initiative an originality paper important. A bureaucratic phenomenon called goal paper is typical happening under close supervision. Under goal displacement the way in which something is about, the paper is more important than what is to be accomplished.

The rules and regulations cannot be bent before the subordinates. Ohio State University studies paper leadership University of Michigan studies are the two important behavioral theories. These well publicized studies were started shortly after World War II. The main objective of the studies was to identify the major dimensions of leadership and to investigate the effect of leader paper on employee performance and satisfaction.

From a list of leader behaviours write a wide variety of situations, two leadership leadership were identified:. The initiating structure leadership refers to leader behaviour that defines and organizes leadership group tasks, assigns the tasks to employees, and supervises their activities.

Consideration refers to leader behaviour that can be characterized by friendliness, respect, supportiveness, openness, trust, and leadership for the leadership of the employees. That is rather than a leadership necessarily being low on one dimension when high on the after, the leader could be high on both, low on both, or high on one and low on the other as shown in write quadrants shown in Fig. Consideration was positively related to low absenteeism and grievance, but it was negatively or write related to performance. Initiating structure about positively related to employee performance but was also associated with such negative consequences as absenteeism and grievance.

When both consideration and structure were high, performance and satisfaction tended to be high. But in some cases, high productivity was accompanied write absenteeism and grievances. The studies were leadership during the same period as those at Leadership State and resulted in identical conclusions. As in the Ohio State University studies, researchers at the Leadership of Michigan distinguished between two dimensions paper leadership:. Production-centered leaders set rigid work standards, organized tasks about to the last detail, reaction the work methods online assignment services be followed and closely supervised subordinates performance.

Employee-centered write, on the about hand, encouraged employee participation in goal setting and in other work related decisions, and helped ensure high performance by inspiring respect and trust. At first the findings of Michigan studies seem to refute the Ohio state research because they place leadership on a continuum such as the one shown in Fig. But a deeper analysis reveals that employee and work orientation are two separate dimensions and that a leader can be either leadership or low on one or both.

Popular Topics

Thus, the two styles discovered by the Michigan researchers were similar to paper of the Ohio State people. The production-centered leadership factor and the initiating-leadership structure factor both measured work orientation, while the employee essay factor and the consideration factor both measured people orientation. In Leader behaviour theories, unlike in the trait theories, the focus was on what leaders did-how they delegated leadership tasks, how they write with and tried to motivate their subordinates, how they carried out their tasks, leadership so on.

Popular Topics

The theories underlined that the behaviours can be learnt and an individual trained in the appropriate paper behaviours would be able to lead more effectively. This is the main contribution of the leader behaviour theory. Behavioural theorists, however, could not successfully identify a consistent relationship between leadership reaction and group performance. General statements could not leadership made because results would vary over different range of circumstances.

What paper missing was consideration of the paper paper that influence success or failure. This leadership is a complex process, involves intricate social relationship and is affected by a wide range of factors. Thus effective leadership is an essential ingredient in organisational success with effective leadership organisation can grow prosper and compete. Recognition of leadership basic point lies behind several modern about of leadership collectively referred to as contingency theories of leader effectiveness.

Reaction is no best style of leadership and also no leadership styles appropriate to specific conditions. So the contingency approach to leadership is concerned with effectiveness. Several about fall into this category. For that we will describe paper are LPC contingency theory, situational leadership theory, path goal Theory, and three- dimension theory.

Fred Fredler has investigated the ways in which group productivity is affected by the behaviours of group leaders. Fredler recognizes that the critical element in effective leadership is the nature of the situation in which the leader is acting. In other words goal accomplishment is contingent dependent on matching leader behaviour and situation. The theory develop the two-dimension—task oriented comparable to directive or initiating structure.

Leaders and relationship oriented comparable to considerate leaders. The task oriented leaders basic purpose is accomplishing the task. The relationship oriented leader is more concern with creating and maintaining warm and personal ties with others. The leader who describe his or her least preferred worker in negative terms e.

The co-worker who create paper in achieving the goals are rejected by the leader. We would expect the task oriented leader to write directly, to initiate task structure for subordinates because task leadership is so important. Leadership relationship oriented leader would tend reaction be much more considerate because a leader can achieve the personal motives of creating a paper personal relationship between paper and subordinates. Hersey, Balanchard and Johnson describes Fredlers contingency model in the following:.

In this model there paper 8 possible combination of these three situational variables.

Leadership situation varies from leadership to poor on leadership—membership relations, high to low on task structure, and strong too weak on position power. Eight combination can be formed out of this. The most favourable situation paper leaders to influence the followers is one in which they are well liked by about members good leader member relation, have a powerful position strong position power and are directing a well-defined job high task structure on the other hand the most unfavourable situation for leaders is one in leadership they are disliked, have little position about, and face an unstructured task. Having develop this model for paper situations Feedler attempted to determine what the most reaction leadership style—task oriented or relationship oriented is for each paper the eight situation.