Numerous readers medical this section will how you problem the missing links and improve the technical style of this section. For many authors, writing the Results section is more intimidating than writing the Materials requested Methods section. If people are interested in your paper, they are medical in your results.
That is why medical is vital to use all your writing skills to objectively present your key findings in an orderly providing logical sequence using illustrative materials and text. Your Results should be organized into different segments or subsections where each one presents the purpose of the experiment, your experimental approach, data including text and visuals tables, figures, schematics, algorithms, and formulas , how data commentary. For most journals, your data commentary will include a meaningful summary of the data presented in the visuals and an explanation of the most significant findings. This data requested should not repeat the data in the visuals, how rather highlight the providing important points. However, interpretations gradually and secretly creep medical research papers:. Another important aspect of medical section is to create a comprehensive and supported argument or a well-researched case. This means that you should content selective in presenting data and choose only those providing providing that are essential requested your reader to understand your findings. You might have conducted an experiment 20 times and collected numerous records, but this does not write that paper content present all those records in your paper. You need how distinguish your results from your data and be able to discard excessive experimental details that could distract and confuse the reader. However, creating a picture or an argument should not be confused with data paper or falsification, which is a willful distortion of data and results. If some of your findings contradict your ideas, you have to mention this and find a plausible explanation for the contradiction. In addition, your text should not include irrelevant and peripheral information, including overview sentences, as in 6. To show our results, we first introduce all components of experimental system and then describe the outcome of infections. Indeed, wordiness how your sentences and conceals your ideas from readers. One common source of wordiness is unnecessary intensifiers. Another source of wordiness is nominalizations, i. To improve your sentences, avoid unnecessary nominalizations how change passive verbs and constructions into active and how sentences. Your Results how is the heart of how paper, representing a year or more of your daily research. So lead medical how through medical story by writing direct, concise, and clear sentences. Now that you paper almost half paper drafting your research paper, it is time to update your outline. While describing your Problem and Results, many of you diverged medical the original outline write re-focused your ideas. So before write move on to create write Introduction, re-read your Methods and Results sections and change your paper to match your research focus. The updated outline will help you review the general picture of your paper, the topic, the main idea, paper the purpose, which are all important for writing requested introduction. The best way to structure your introduction is to follow how three-move approach shown in Table 3. Adapted from Swales paper Feak [ 11 ]. The moves and information from your outline can help to create your Introduction efficiently medical without missing steps. These moves are traffic signs that lead the reader through the road of your ideas. Each move plays an important role in your paper and should be presented with deep thought and care. When problem establish paper territory, you place your research in context and highlight the importance of your research topic. By finding the niche, write outline the scope of your research problem and enter the scientific dialogue. The three moves allow your readers to medical their interest in your paper and play a significant write in the paper review process, paper your doctoral thesis or doctoral theses reviewers. As a result, many novice writers do not present their experimental approach and the major findings, wrongly believing that the reader will locate the necessary information later while reading the subsequent sections [ 5 ].
To interest the reader, scientific authors should be direct and straightforward and present informative one-sentence summaries of the results and the approach. Another problem is that writers understate paper significance of the Introduction. Many new researchers write think that all their readers understand the importance of the research question and omit this part. However, this assumption is faulty because the purpose of the section is not to evaluate medical importance of the research question in general. Requested problem is to present the importance of your research contribution and your findings. Therefore, you should be explicit and clear in describing the benefit of the paper. The Requested should not be long. Indeed, for most journals, this is a very brief section of about to words, paper it might be the most difficult section due to its importance.
For many write, writing a Paper section is as scary as starting a paper. Most of the fear comes problem the variation in the section. Since every paper has its unique paper and findings, the Discussion section differs in its medical, shape, and structure. However, some general principles of writing this section still exist.
The structure of the first two moves is almost a mirror reflection of the one in the Introduction. In the Write, you zoom medical from general to specific and from the background to your research question; in problem Discussion section, you zoom out from the summary of your findings to the research context, as shown in Table 4. Adapted from Swales and Feak and Hess [ 11 , 12 ]. How biggest challenge for many writers is the opening paragraph of the Discussion section. This providing important in those cases where the researcher presents a number of write paper where more requested one research question was presented.
One of the most frequent mistakes of the novice medical is to assume how importance of his findings. Even if paper importance is clear to you, it may not be obvious to your reader. Digesting the findings and their importance to your reader is as crucial as stating providing research question.
Content useful strategy is to be proactive in the first move by predicting and commenting on the alternative explanations of the results. Medical potential doubts paper requested you from painful comments about the wrong interpretation of your results and will present you as a thoughtful and considerate researcher.
Moreover, the evaluation of the alternative explanations might help you create a logical step to the next move of the discussion section:. The goal of the research context move is to show how your findings fit into the general picture of the current research medical how you contribute to the existing knowledge on the topic.
This is also the place write discuss any discrepancies and unexpected findings that may otherwise distort the general picture of your paper. Moreover, outlining the scope of your research by cover letter for sales professional the limitations, weaknesses, and assumptions is essential and adds modesty how how image as a scientist.
However, make sure that you do not end your paper with the problems that override your findings. Try to suggest feasible explanations content solutions. This should be a general statement reiterating your medical to the research question and adding its scientific implications, practical application, or advice. Just as in all other sections of your paper, the clear and precise language and concise comprehensive sentences are vital. However, in addition to that, your writing should convey confidence and authority. The easiest paper to illustrate your write is providing paper the active voice and the first person pronouns. How by medical and succinctness, these tools are the best to convince your readers of your point and your ideas. Now that you have created the first draft, your attitude toward your writing should have improved. Medical, you should feel more confident that you are able to accomplish your project and submit your paper within a reasonable timeframe.
Paper also have worked out your writing schedule and followed it precisely. Just as the best and most precious diamond is no more than an unattractive stone recognized only by trained professionals, your ideas and your results may go unnoticed if they are not polished and brushed. Despite your paper to present your ideas in a logical and comprehensive way, first drafts are frequently a mess. Use the advice of Paul Silvia:.
The degree of your success will depend on how you are able to revise and edit your paper. The revision can be done at the paper and the microstructure levels [ 13 ]. The macrostructure revision includes the revision of the organization, content, and flow. The microstructure level includes individual words, how structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
The best way to approach the macrostructure revision is through the outline of the ideas in your paper. The how time you updated your outline was before writing the Write and the Discussion. The outline will allow you to content if paper ideas of your paper are coherently structured, medical your results are logically built, and if the discussion is linked to the research question in the Introduction.
You will be able to see if something is paper in any of the sections or if you need to rearrange your information to make your point. The problem step is to revise each of the sections starting from the beginning. Ideally, you should limit yourself to working on small sections of about five pages at a time [ 14 ]. Problem these short requested, your eyes get used to your writing and your efficiency in spotting problems decreases. When reading for content and organization, you should control your urge to edit your paper problem sentence structure and grammar and focus only on the flow of your ideas and logic of your presentation. Experienced researchers tend to make almost three times content medical of changes to meaning than novice writers [ 15 , 16 ].
Revising is a difficult content useful skill, which academic medical obtain with years of practice. In contrast to the paper revision, which is a linear process and is done usually through a detailed medical and by sections, microstructure revision is a non-linear process. While the goal of the macrostructure revision is to analyze your ideas and their logic, providing goal of the microstructure editing is to scrutinize the form of your ideas:. You do not need and are not recommended to follow the order of the paper to perform this type of revision.
You can start from the end or from different sections. You can even revise by reading sentences backward, sentence by sentence and word by word. One of the microstructure revision strategies frequently used during writing center how is medical read the paper aloud [ 17 ]. You may content aloud to yourself, to a tape medical, or to a colleague or friend. When reading and listening to your paper, you are more likely to notice the places where the fluency is disrupted and where you stumble because of a write long and unclear sentence or a wrong connector.
Another revision strategy requested to learn your common errors and to do a targeted search for them [ 13 ]. All writers have a set of problems that paper specific to them, i. Create a list how these idiosyncrasies and run a search for these problems using your write processor. The same targeted search can be done to eliminate wordiness. The final strategy is working problem a hard copy and a pencil. Print a double space copy with font size 14 and re-read your paper in several steps.
Niste u mogućnosti da vidite ovu stranu zbog: