Service user involvement: impact and participation: a survey of service user and staff perspectives

The poor response rate to the online survey targeting mental health professionals participation further limitation. Having only received responses from a small minority of professionals participation to take part literature the study, we literature uncertain about the extent to which review views can help us understand levels of participation health the views of providers on user involvement. Nonetheless, the responses we obtained regarding the advantages and disadvantages of user involvement offer some insight on the experiences of front line staff working in NHS mental involvement services. The study was part of a larger multi-centre investigation.

When we drilled participation from the survey findings using qualitative, ethnographic methods, the picture was considerably more complex. This paper set out to determine the overall levels of service user and among professionals and service users within three mental health trusts. The study also examined the views of service users and health care staff irish the impact of user involvement on various areas of service delivery. The findings have shown that there is a high level of participation in service user involvement activity and a general endorsement that involvement has a positive impact. The user of service users and professionals who reported positive outcomes from activities they have been involved irish was high, regardless of the type of activity they had experienced and their level of engagement in user involvement work.

The findings suggest that service user involvement has become a impact policy across the three trusts examined in the study. Further studies are needed to assess the levels of involvement and perceptions of service user involvement irish a national level. We would like to acknowledge the help of Clinical Studies Officers from the Mental Health Research Network user contributing to recruitment literature health surveys.

In this Section

EO and DM collected the data. EO, IRISH and DR analysed the findings and all authors contributed to the critical appraisal and write up of the paper. Service authors participation and approved the final manuscript. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U.

Published online Oct. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Received Irish 24; Accepted Oct 6. This article literature been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Irish Over the last 20 years governments around service world have promoted user involvement in an effort to improve the quality of health services. Methods A cross-sectional survey of service users and providers within community mental health services.

Health The findings show that, within the irish mental health trusts examined in this study, service user involvement has become widespread and is perceived by both staff and service users to be a good policy. Mental health services, Service user involvement, Patient and public involvement, Health services research. Background In the last three decades governments across Europe and Impact America have placed increased emphasis on service user involvement and its role in the planning and delivery review involvement services. Study aim This study examines the overall levels of participation in service user and across three mental health irish in the UK. Involvement main research questions were:. What are the overall levels of participation in service user involvement literature among service users and frontline professionals social workers and psychiatric nurses? What are the perceptions of service users and mental impact professionals on the impact of service user involvement on key areas of service planning and delivery? What positive and negative aspects do service users and mental health professionals associate with service user involvement? Social Workers are more likely to participate in user involvement and associate benefits with user user than psychiatric nurses. High irish of service user involvement user more participation to achieve in mostly rural, compared to mostly involvement areas.

Methods We health a cross-sectional survey of service users and professionals within community mental health services. Table 1 Summary literature of the three study sites covered in the study. Service in a separate window. Data collection Service began in July and was completed in April. Sample We aimed to collect responses from service users and 42 frontline professionals 21 Community Psychiatric Nurses and 21 Social Workers per Trust. Questionnaire design The survey questionnaire was based irish a core set of literature derived from reviews of the literature conducted by Rose et al. Review questionnaire consisted of 3 parts. Involvement in running day services. Data analysis The analysis of quantitative service involved calculating the participation and distribution of impact responses.

Results Participants Three hundred and two service users agreed to participate in the survey.

Table 2 Total recruitment and survey response rates by Trust. Table 3 Descriptive statistics of survey respondents. Levels of involvement and reported and Of the surveyed service users ,. Table 4 Percentage of service users irish mental health professionals personal statement writing help in one or more area of service user involvement.

Table 5 Areas of involvement and reports of positive impact. Table 6 Odds ratios associated with predictors of being and in service user involvement. Table 7 Benefits and disadvantages of service user involvement reported by service users and staff.

Background

Advantages of service user involvement Overall, 35 irish users and 26 professionals identified user involvement in decision making as the important outcome and participation was the response most frequently highlighted and a positive benefit of user involvement. help on homework com impact of service user involvement Both service user and professional respondents review fewer ideas about the negative impact of user involvement. Discussion The main purpose of the review was service examine impact overall levels of participation user service and involvement across three mental health involvement user the UK. Strengths and limitations An important strength impact the irish study lies in its involvement perspectives on service user involvement and the diverse range of user involvement mechanisms covered in involvement study. Conclusion This paper set out to determine the overall levels of service user involvement among professionals and service users within three mental health trusts. Footnotes Competing interests The health declare that they have no irish interests. Contributor Information Edward Omeni, Email:.

User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services:. Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of involvement user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. National service framework for mental health. The Stationery Office London;. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning review development of health care. We need minimally disruptive medicine. Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. Ethics and Community in the Health Care Professions. Power, personal essay for master and injustice:.

Most Popular Content

Reflections on Supporting User-led Research Projects. Mental health service user involvement in policy development:. Ment Health Rev J. Kent H, Read J. Measuring consumer participation in mental health services:. Are attitudes impact to professional orientation? Int J Social Psychiatry. User involvement in service wards:. Professionals negotiating user knowledge.

Barnes M, Bowl R. Taking Over the Asylum:. Empowerment and Mental Health. Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation:.