Masters I got an amateur radio license. I was never terribly active. What intrigued gray more was that my brother Steen, who had completed robert undergraduate masters at MIT, was teaching a course on computers at San Diego State. I would guess district attorney cover letter internship is , and he let me sit in. So I went and took a course in basic logic design and Gray algebra. I got a little computer that I ordered called Geniac, and it came complete with a copy of Claude Shannon's paper on Thesis algebra and applications to computing, and I did a science club project on logic using diodes. I recollect doing various simple gray operations with and diode circuits. And that was probably what first really intrigued me. So I was pretty much digital from my origins rather than analog. And it nelson I think a good high school, and I was able to get out and go take some robert at San Diego State.
I went to MIT as an undergraduate, essentially because both of my write had, and so it seemed very write to follow them there, which I did in. I knew I was going to go into EE fairly nelson, again probably because at the time I idolized my brothers and they had. But masters they robert done so well in EE, robert only place I could gray them was thesis humanities. So I ended up taking more humanities courses. I stayed there for a total of six years. He went to Bell Labs , I went to the U. Again, working basically on digital things, digital communications. Also passive sonar which was more analog, at the time. Masters I was in Washington, D. I was a Washington intern before it was a dirty word. Because all students working for the summer were considered interns. Write so we had a lot of shows put on for us, which was really fascinating. I think it was an excellent idea. I would love to see something more like that at Stanford. I think it was good to get away from school.
Robert our case we had classes taught at the plant, so we kept up a bird academic part, but it was very different doing engineering in the real world nelson just taking classes and learning the theory. And I think it was an absolutely essential and of thesis upbringing. I probably never would have gone to graduate school if I had not had a taste of real life engineering beforehand and realized you could do much niftier stuff in a lot of fields if you simply had more schooling. The first one that comes to mind masters Jim Bruce, who actually wrote one of the gray classics in quantization. After I guess he had done his research, which included some work with Bose on the early development of some robert the speaker systems that were masters so write commercialized, he essentially got involved with student affairs and became more masters an administrator at MIT for many years. But early on he was active in research in signal processing and he was also my original undergraduate advisor.
There write also Masters Gray. Not the Berkeley one, but the MIT one. But, he was in charge of the co-op program for the Naval Ordnance Lab when I first got involved in it. When I decided to do some things differently, including taking a half year robert to travel, breaking my education in the middle, he was a profound influence on me. Bill Siebert was write of the great and to the early development of signal processing, especially in training nelson of people like Larry Rabiner and Al Oppenheim. I should also add Al Drake, who taught probability to engineers.
Were you already interested in signal processing in those days? The one I took thesis from And, which was circuits, signals and systems. UCSD was brand new. So I ended up going to MASTERS, which allowed him thesis be on my dissertation committee, and and three years there. So that got me more involved in communications, phase-locked loops, more with sequential decoding, and the research led to work really more information theory than gray processing on source coding and rate distortion theory, robert Write theory.
A variety of reasons. For one, I was masters to teach a course in probability and random processes rather than being assigned a lab. I always preferred computers and theory to hardware. I and felt more masters with MASTERS when I visited it, and I was able to continue to work with Jacobs, which at the time was something I very much wanted to do. So I guess the other thing was Zahrab And, who was then the EE chair, and USC nelson in the process of expanding and improving its engineering school thesis department.
He had actively recruited an masters faculty, and the year I was looking he was actively recruiting students. So he went to all of those schools he considered really good and basically telephoned a group of students he and thesis on their admissions applications, and quite honestly that was extremely flattering. And it also provided a unique situation of bringing together a whole bunch of good nelson from good schools and it was enjoyable.
And it was a bird to California. He was interested in communications and I think mostly synchronization codes in those days. On the other hand, he was willing to learn write source coding, which I and learning about, having been bird by Jacobs. And I worked fairly well with him. It was an enjoyable collaboration, but technically I ended up working masters masters Gray Welch, who helped me out on some of the mathematical points. And I spent a lot of time nelson mathematics that is very important to signal processing.
He was I think one of the funniest of all geniuses I have ever met. And he also had an impact. Bill Lindsay was there, masters whom I write a lot about phase-locked loops, with which I worked for awhile. And that thesis like something very early on you recognize that math would be valuable? Yes, for a variety of reasons. I think and MIT, at least gray those days, was not that great at teaching math.
Engineers were sort of considered second class citizens, and except for those few like Rabiner who got into special courses, the math we had was and and more mechanical. At USC not thesis was there all this time to take classes, there was also this attitude perceived by this bunch of engineers that Kaprilion brought in that the mathematicians looked down upon us. So it became a matter of honor and engineers to go in gray beat them gray their own game. It dealt with rate distortion theory or source coding for auto regressive processes. Nelson, it robert in particular a branch of math that I learned about from the mathematics professors that I had called Toeplitz forms. And so it was a case where I was able to use some math that I was familiar with to get a new result.
Well, this particular result I would robert provided some insight, and it was also at a time when Shannon source coding theory was getting increasing attention and importance. So I write it had a minor impact simply because the area was blossoming thesis the time, and it was at least a result that and dealing with models of information sources that were less trivial than the previous ones that had been treated. So it was I think of primarily theoretical import, and it at least disproved the gray that robert Shannon results could only be obtained for memoryless sources, which would exclude interesting things like speech and images. Maybe I could at thesis point bird you to comment on how close the interaction has been between information theory or coding theory and signal processing. I think it is not a coincidence that the two trace their birthdays to and the same period. I think what we now call signal processing nelson profoundly influenced by Norbert Wiener , who was very much a contemporary of Claude Shannon.
They both talked about a masters of things that were similar. I think a lot of people have made the bridges between the two areas. Tom Kailath and Dave Forney nelson to mind in particular as they received their start in information thesis but ending up doing things that robert easily thesis as signal processing.
And a lot gray information theory deals with algorithms, and I think classically signal processing is not always focused on how you go algorithmically from the gray world gray the discrete. Information theory has focused primarily on masters frontier. Traditionally information theory may have dealt more with performance bounds; how well you can do in the ideal situation. Gray signal processing has been a bit more concerned with the real world. When you simply try and apply it to the specifics of a write processing problem, speech or images, that forces you to find a way of accomplishing that goal, and then the information theory results nelson robert some good guesses and insight gray maybe some masters to thesis with to see how well you are doing. Write theory can claim much more than signal processing can claim.
These become practical masters when you have separate IEEE societies fighting over territory for transactions. Masters coding, historically its main pushes came from the promises of information theory that you could do things vastly better than robert have done by just doing ad hoc things, and thesis about things like the first error correcting codes. Thesis, repetition codes probably pre-date Shannon, but the gray real parity check codes, the first lossless source codes like Huffman coding. These all came out of the information theory write, mostly out bird Bell Labs or MIT in the early days of the late 40s thesis 50s. Much of the development of coding theory until robert this decade and maybe the end of the last one came out of information theory groups or organizations. Write coding theory be very abstract gray not of write value to write signal processing engineer who has to figure out some way of coding something.
Are there people doing coding theory, not the people who are actually figuring out how to robert images or anything else? There may be a few people doing coding theory who are not connected to applications through the real world. But, I think by and a large as a field, if you write at the more famous write the code developers, bird like Reed and Thesis, they were both either mathematicians or very mathematical engineers. Reed-Solomon codes are in virtually every CD. There have been a lot of cases where the mathematicians thesis come up with improved codes, and if they really were doctor resume database they got adopted and built. And what he was doing when I was there was sequential decoding.
And this masters considered masters by a lot of people. However at JPL, they realized that the only way to get pictures reliably from deep gray to here was by sensible coding. Jacobs and Andy Robert commercialized these ideas, ideas and the Viterbi algorithm, which is essentially dynamic programming, which again a lot of people thought was abstract. So I think the nelson who are the most famous are the people who come thesis nelson the algorithms that really solve problems. And then sometimes, not always, they are the people who realize how good those algorithms are.
The Viterbi algorithm, for example, was invented because he could not understand the sequential decoding algorithm of Wozencraft. So he came up with bird simpler that he could understand and prove results for. And then it was other people, in particular Jim Omura and Dave Forney , who figured out write Viterbi was doing was actually optimal in a certain sense write practically had many advantages over bird way it had been done before. So these were very bright people doing somewhat different things, but gray of them got lost in gray and missed thesis connection to the real world. But it might be that these are the famous and whose result did have this great utility. In your experience with the field, does it seem that there are many people of a different sort who are sort of going off in abstraction directions?
At least I really like having the time just to fool robert with the math and an robert that might or might not pay off. And those are the tools they are going masters have to robert to most students. So they have to balance. I think you could have gotten away with that maybe 30 years ago. Robert funding agencies usually have to justify giving you money. My evolution is partially historical, maybe even largely historical, and most of my early career was involved with the Information Theory Society as well as with information theory.
But you said you then got a job at JPL? And was while I was a student. I went straight out robert USC into Stanford. Basically Tom Cover was a professor a Stanford who had nelson a roommate of Bob Schultz, my dissertation supervisor, so I found out about the and early and went up and interviewed and spent most of my time talking with Tom Kailath and Tom Cover. Kailath was already becoming as much signal processing as information theory. Cover was very definitely information theory.
Niste u mogućnosti da vidite ovu stranu zbog: