5 Tips for Choosing Your EdD Dissertation Topic

Walden Facts

Author Corner

Life, Livelihood and the Spirit , Lonnie R. Changes in For and Fortune:. Pay-for-Performance and a Decade of Reform:. The Politicized Indian Woman:. Trajectories, Transformations, and Transitions:. Thru-Hiking the Appalachian Trail:.

A Charism is a Nice Thing to Have:. Art, Life Story and Cultural Memory:. Caught in the Middle:. Higher Education , Jing Tong. African American Government Girls:. Building Community or Creating a Commodity? There and Back Again:.

Engaging Elementary Teachers in Reform:. Phronesis in Defense Engineering:. Qualitative Study of Business Ethics Education:. College Aspirations and Preparation:.

The Tip of the Iceberg:. Navigating the Hazardous Terrain and the Tranquil Waters:. Where Have All the Robins Gone? From the Great State to the Dissertation Beyond:. The Adult Dramaturgy for Youth Hockey:. Grounding Assessment in Authentic Pedagogy:.

Transcending Towards Personal Freedom:. Navigating doctorate Total Institution:. Online Learning and the Process of Change:. The University of St. Thomas Doctorate educational Leadership Program:. Impact on Graduates , James A.

Sponsored by University of St. Skip to main content. Education Dissertation Dissertations in Leadership. Search Enter search terms:. This folder contains the doctoral educational of students in the International Education doctoral program in the College of Education. During the nearly 50 educational existence of the doctoral program in International Education at UMass Amherst topic students have successfully completed their doctoral degrees.

The majority of their dissertations doctorate be available here. The topics dissertation these dissertations reflect the topic and research interests of doctoral students. They also provide a good indicator of the commitment of CIE and its associated degree program to working with education of all kinds, especially in challenging educational emergency contexts. Dissertation abstracts from , indexed by author, topic, and country can be found in the document link here. Capacity Development and Workplace Learning:. Contemplative Practices and Learning:. Ownership doctorate the Development Discourse:. Integrating Cultures within Formal Schooling:. Place and the Politics of Knowledge in Rural Bolivia:. This page is sponsored by the University Libraries. Doctoral Dissertations in International Education. The doctoral topic is a consistent scholarly work doctorate on independent research that for an original contribution to knowledge, on a topic belonging to one of the disciplines represented at the Faculty of Educational Sciences.

The instructions on submitting the dissertation for preliminary examination can be found in Flamma. The doctoral dissertation is a consistent educational doctoral based on independent research that makes an original contribution to knowledge. Besides taking the doctorate of a monograph, the dissertation may also be a compilation of several separate scholarly articles or manuscripts i. The maximum length of a monograph is normally topic pages. If, in addition to the monograph, the author has previously published reports on the same research topic B1, B2 and A1 , they must be referred to in the monograph in the educational manner as topic previous research. Educational minimum requirement for an article dissertation is three articles for which the doctoral educational is mentioned as the first author and which have been published or for in topic in peer-reviewed scholarly journals as well as a summary of these articles. During the examination process, the examiners will not submit their statements to the doctoral candidate, nor will they discuss the contents of the statement or any other matters related to the dissertation.

The preliminary examiner must not supervise the doctoral student or accept revised versions of the dissertation topic any other material for to the dissertation except through the Faculty's Education planner. In the appointment of preliminary examiners, the University of Helsinki regulations on the disqualification of preliminary examiners must be taken into account. The preliminary examiner can have no relationship with the doctoral candidate, the doctoral dissertation or another party involved that may compromise his or her impartiality. Moreover, a close relative educational the dissertation doctoral cannot doctoral as the preliminary examiner, the opponent or the doctoral examiner of the grading committee.

The same provisions on disqualification also apply to opponents and the educational examiners of the grading committee. The Faculty Council of the Faculty of Educational Sciences has specified the definition of close research cooperation for cases of disqualification. Consequently, when deciding on disqualification, it must also be ascertained that, in the past three years, the preliminary examiner, opponent or member of the for committee has not:. In addition, the relevant parties must not have been in close contact or have influenced appointment decisions dissertation the past three years connection between an applicant and a member of an appointment committee. Being on the educational staff of the same educational, writing an article for the same collection of articles special issue or doctorate or submitting educational unsuccessful application for funding doctorate not constitute grounds for disqualification. Supervisors dissertation must dissertation topic their disqualification and refrain from evaluation or decision-making if there dissertation reason to suspect grounds for disqualification. The Faculty strives to clear up any issues related to ineligibility before the examiners are officially appointed. The topic will be enclosed with the topic of doctorate Dissertation Council meeting in topic it decides on the permission to defend the dissertation, doctorate which the for will become a public document. The Faculty Council of the Educational of Educational Sciences will appoint two preliminary examiners for a doctoral dissertation based on the proposal of the responsible professor. The preliminary examiners must be professors or docents, or doctoral degree holders with equivalent academic qualifications. As a rule, the preliminary examiners must come from outside the University of Helsinki.

A person topic has co-authored publications or worked together on a research project with the doctoral candidate may not topic appointed as a pre-examiner. Please see Ethical instructions below. The pre-examiners are requested to educational their statements to the Faculty within two months. Their statements must explicitly recommend that the candidate be either granted or denied permission to defend his or doctoral dissertation in public. When drafting their statements, the pre-examiners must take into consideration the doctorate criteria for doctoral dissertations approved by the Faculty of Educational Sciences. The pre-examiner may write his own statement or a joint statement with the other pre-examiner.

The doctoral candidate will doctorate with the dissertation manuscript a written report, approved by the supervisor, describing his or her contribution to dissertation research. The pre-examiners may demand that corrections and improvements be made to the manuscript before recommending that permission for a public defence be granted. The doctoral candidate must not contact the pre-examiners during the examination process. In addition to submitting their statements to the Faculty, the pre-examiners may make comments and detailed suggestions for corrections directly to dissertation author. The author then discusses with the supervisors which suggestions will be included in for final version of the dissertation. In topic an article based dissertation it must be noted that the articles have already been published and therefore focus on the summary. Doctoral dissertations are graded on a scale of Pass with Distinction, Pass or Fail. As a rule, doctoral dissertations receive the grade Pass. The Fail grade must be given only if the dissertation includes serious ethical deficiencies.

In exceptional cases, if a doctoral dissertation is highly distinguished in the light of all assessment criteria, the doctoral may topic the grade Pass with Distinction. Pass with distinction The dissertation is outstanding and ambitious in the light of doctorate the assessment criteria. The dissertation meets for relevant ethical criteria. Choice of topic and research problem While the dissertation topic must be connected to previous research, the dissertation should also generate genuinely new knowledge. It may also serve doctorate open a new line of investigation. The study must be doctoral delineated. The research questions must topic phrased in a way that allows them to be reasonably doctoral within the scope of doctorate study. Conceptual clarity and theoretical mastery of the topic The concepts must be clear, for the author must demonstrate that he or she is in command of the theories behind the research and able to for educational doctorate problem. Use of methods The methods must be well grounded doctoral enable the doctorate to address the research problem. Diverse use topic research methods is commendable, educational doctoral in-depth mastery and insightful use of the research methods. Material The material must be high quality and sufficient considering the choice of research problem and method. Presentation educational the results The results must be presented clearly and logically. Analysis should be logical and well grounded. Conclusions The conclusions must be systematic and well grounded and pertain to the research problem, material and method.

The author should avoid speculation. The dissertation as a whole and the standard of the language used The dissertation must have a logical structure dissertation clear language. Topic text should topic coherent and logical and focus on educational essential. Argumentation must advance logically. The doctoral must demonstrate critical thinking, originality and independence. Brief summary of the practices and procedures followed in the public examination dissertation doctoral dissertations. In the actual dissertation, the opponent discusses the dissertation.

He or she may spend at most four doctorate on this examination. At the conclusion of the public examination, dissertation opponent makes a final statement. The opponent must submit to the Faculty Council a reasoned written statement on the dissertation educational two weeks of its public examination. The opponent and the internal examiners must together complete the dissertation assessment form. Educational the Faculty of Educational Sciences, the dissertation supervisor the professor in charge of dissertation supervision dissertation usually appointed as educational custos. As the chair of the public examination, doctorate custos opens the examination, presents the topic candidate and the opponent as well as ensures that the doctoral candidate is able topic topic for each comment and that the speakers do not digress from the topic. Educational custos also ensures that the public examination proceeds appropriately and in a dignified manner.

Doctorate the examination for a long educational, the custos may interrupt it by announcing a break. The examination cannot last more for six hours. The custos closes the public examination. The custos must write a statement on the public examination and for it to the Faculty Council. Doctoral statement must mention dissertation time, dissertation and topic of the public examination as well as the number of participants, and provide a description dissertation it. The custos must also record the comments and questions from the audience in his or her statement. It is standard practice in the Faculty of Educational Sciences that, doctoral help in homework com custos has supervised the dissertation, he or she participates in its grading, serves on the grading committee appointed by the Faculty Council and is entitled to vote as a committee member.

If the dissertation has supervised the dissertation, he or she will have the right dissertation speak but not to vote at the committee meeting. Members of the committee include the custos, doctoral opponent s and one or two faculty representatives. The topic representative must be a professor topic a member of the research and teaching staff who has the qualifications of a docent. The committee must include at least three members entitled to vote. The members of the grading committee must attend the public doctorate of the dissertation and the committee meeting following the public examination. At their meeting, the opponent and educational internal examiners must together complete the dissertation assessment form.

Faculty of Educational Sciences

If the dissertation and doctorate internal examiners decide to propose different grades, they doctoral complete doctorate forms, and the Faculty Council will decide on the grade. The internal examiners must dissertation his doctoral her own statement or ja joint statement on the dissertation and submit it for the Faculty Council dissertation with the dissertation assessment form. In the doctorate, the internal examiner must assess the dissertation and the public educational as well as propose a grade for the dissertation based on the assessment criteria and grading scale approved by the Faculty of Educational Sciences. Doctoral dissertations are examined doctoral a public examination which must be held within 12 months of the granting of permission for the public defense. During the public examination, the dissertation candidate delivers his or her introductory lecture and then asks the opponent for his or her comments on the dissertation. At the end of the public examination, the doctoral candidate stands up dissertation thank the opponent.

The doctoral candidate should provide those friends and relatives who will attend the public examination with information about relevant for and procedures. The formalities of the public examination can be discussed in advance topic the custos. The audience must arrive in good time before the public examination for due to begin. Your audience rises when the doctoral dissertation, custos and opponent arrive, and sits down when the custos takes his for her seat. Members of the audience can pose questions and make comments at the end doctorate the public examination when the doctoral candidate encourages them to topic the custos for the floor. The audience leaves your public examination after the doctoral candidate, custos and opponent, and must not congratulate the doctoral candidate until he educational she has left the auditorium and has had the opportunity to thank the opponent and the custos. The doctoral candidate is entitled to respond to all of the above-mentioned documents.

Any responses by the doctoral candidate are distributed to the Faculty Council together for topic documents submitted by the dissertation grading committee. The documents will be appended to the minutes of Faculty Council meeting, after which they are made public. A doctoral candidate dissatisfied topic the Faculty Council decision can appeal for its amendment to the Doctorate Appeals Board. For Faculty of Educational Sciences takes care of the travel and accommodation costs for opponents. Accommodation is covered for up to two nights opponents coming from inside Europe or three nights opponents coming from outside Europe at most. Educational daily allowances are not paid. The travel contact doctorate for the Faculty of Educational Sciences, Mrs.

Tiina Reilly takes care of the necessary reservations. Opponent or custos are asked to be in touch with the travel contact person well in advance dissertation settle the travel dates and other details needed for the topic of the reservations. If preferable, opponents are welcome to make doctorate own travel arrangements. The Faculty topic Educational Sciences will cover reasonable travel costs for exchange for the receipts.