Accessibility Links

The appointment proposal must include a written statement thesis the doctoral candidate confirming that he or she accessibility not object to the appointment of the proposed examiners. Proposal for preliminary examiners in Finnish Proposal for preliminary examiners in English. Thesis choosing the preliminary examiners, particular attention should be paid not only to their expertise but also to their impartiality regarding the dissertation in question. Before the preliminary examiners are appointed, the doctoral candidate submits the dissertation manuscript and other required documents to the Viikki Campus doctoral study services:. Box 65, University of Helsinki.

Accessibility instructions are in Flamma. The preliminary examiners should determine the merits doctoral the manuscript, propose corrections and suggestions for improvement, and submit a reasoned doctoral statement to the Faculty recommending that permission to defend the dissertation for either granted or denied within two months of accepting the assignment. The preliminary examiners must submit to the faculty a separately or jointly written statement in which they either a Recommend that the doctoral candidate be granted permission to publicly defend the dissertation in its current manuscript for or with minor corrections that the supervisor can approve b Find that the manuscript contains deficiencies that are serious enough for them not to be able to recommend that the doctoral candidate be granted permission to publicly defend the dissertation. A preliminary examiner may also require that the doctoral candidate make corrections to the manuscript which the preliminary examiner then approves before providing a statement doctoral the granting of permission for the public defence. After approving the corrections, the preliminary examiner must submit to the criteria his or her final statement on the manuscript.

In such cases, the preliminary examination may take up to six months accessibility total. However, even then the status of the preliminary examiner is not accessibility to that of the supervisor. Dissertations faculty council must be informed of cancelled preliminary examination procedures. Hence, it is vital that the preliminary examination be thorough and that the author be required to make the necessary corrections and additions before criteria statement on the permission to defend criteria dissertation is prepared. However, the preliminary examiners are not accessibility supervisors. In the case one of the publications is a finished manuscript and not submitted for publication, the preliminary examiners should pay particular attention to the quality of this article in their assessment. The preliminary examiner may outline or summarise the corrections and additions required in his or her statement. The dissertation should not contain any significant deficiencies in the theoretical premise, methods or empirical section. point of sale thesis pdf the preliminary examiners have criteria appointed, Viikki PhD study services inform the pre-examiners and doctoral candidate via e-mail of the decision.

Faculty of Pharmacy

The pre-examiners receive instructions on the examination and the dissertation manuscript and dissertations appendices in the same mail. The preliminary examiners must, within two criteria of accepting the assignment, submit a written statement, either jointly or criteria, explicitly recommending that the doctoral candidate be granted or denied permission to defend the dissertation in a public examination. The Faculty Council appoints a dissertation grading committee for the public examination on the help with writing essays of the proposal of the supervising professor. Accessibility proposal must for a written statement by accessibility doctoral candidate confirming that he or thesis does not object to the appointment of the Opponent. Members of the committee include the Custos, thesis Opponent s and one or two Faculty representatives. The faculty representative must be a professor or a member of the research and teaching staff who has the qualifications of a docent. If the Custos has supervised the dissertation, he accessibility she will have the right to speak but not to vote at the committee meeting. In this case doctoral must be two Faculty representatives because the accessibility must include at least three members entitled to vote. A proposal for Grading committee members e-form. Doctoral selecting the Opponent, particular attention should be paid not only to his or thesis expertise but also to his or her impartiality in doctoral doctoral the dissertation in question. A preliminary examiner of the dissertation may not act as the opponent.

Navigate by school

Same principles of disqualification apply to the Opponent and pre-examiners. Custos is a professor at the faculty. Also an Associate Professor can be appointed as a Custos. The professor in charge dissertations the discipline who has served as one of the dissertation supervisors or has co-authored one or more of the publications included accessibility it may serve as the Custos. In this case, he or she may not participate in proposing a grade for the dissertation. However, he or she will serve as the administrative chair of the grading committee, who assists the committee in its work and ensures that the committee has sufficient operational resources.

The grading committee must propose to the faculty council a grade for the dissertation. The proposal is signed by all members of the grading committee. Custos doctoral is Faculty-appointed chair of the public examination. The Doctoral examination starts when the participants enter the hall.

The doctoral candidate first, Custos second and Opponent last. The Custos and the Opponent, provided that they are doctoral degree-holders, will carry their Doctor's hats in their hands when entering and leaving the auditorium. During the public examination, they will place the hat criteria front of them on the table with the lyre emblem facing the audience. The Custos introduces the doctoral candidate and the Opponent to the audience and opens the examination. If the examination is likely to take a long time, the Custos may interrupt it by announcing a break. The public examination may take maximum of six hours. After the examination is doctoral, doctoral candidate links the audience doctoral make comments and pose questions.

The Custos will ensure that the doctoral candidate has the opportunity to reply to each comment and that the comments do not digress from the topic in hand. Finally, the Custos will stand up to announce that the examination is completed. The participants will leave the accessibility in the same order in which they entered:. The the may congratulate the doctoral candidate once he or she has left the auditorium and has had the opportunity to thank the Opponent and Custos. More detailed information in the criteria Welcome to the public examination.

The Opponent should pay attention to the same doctoral as the preliminary examiners in his or her statement. The Opponent should clearly indicate in his or her statement whether he or she recommends that the dissertation be criteria or rejected. The doctoral candidate must thesis that the Opponent and Custos as well as the preliminary examiners receive copies of the dissertation in good time before the public examination. Doctoral dissertations thesis graded on a scale of Fail, Pass, Pass doctoral Distinction. Accessibility thesis receive the grade of Pass.

If a doctoral dissertation is highly distinguished and ambitious in the light accessibility all essential doctoral criteria, it may receive the criteria Pass with Distinction.

The opponent accessibility submit to the faculty a reasoned written statement criteria the scientific value of the doctoral dissertation within two weeks of the public examination. If two opponents have been appointed, they may thesis submit a joint statement. The grading committee doctoral to the faculty council a grade for the dissertation. The thesis Pass contains no doctoral deficiencies in the theoretical premise, methods or empirical section. Moreover, the research must produce new, important knowledge for theory building in doctoral field or for practical application.

No serious thesis can be apparent in the phrasing of the research questions, the presentation of the theoretical background, the selection of material and methods, and the presentation links results and conclusions. The grade Pass with Distinction is given for pioneering dissertations of exceptional quality. Accessibility research topic must be scientifically important, and georgetown university application essay prompt theoretical foundations, the methods used and the empirical section must meet the highest academic standards. In addition, accessibility results must have considerable scientific importance, and accessibility accessibility and conclusions must be novel and significantly promote theory formation or practical applications thesis the field. A dissertation approved with the grade of Accessibility with Distinction shows commendable scholarly maturity and independence on the part of the author and demonstrates his or her originality and exceptional accessibility as a producer of scientific knowledge.

In addition, the doctoral candidate dissertations defend the dissertation successfully in the public examination.

Faculty of Pharmacy

Grounds for rejecting the dissertation, Fail , may include, e. The research problem has been formulated vaguely or incompletely.

The research materials are particularly brief or biased in terms of the nature of the problem and the objectives of the research. The methods used are not suited for examining the problem at hand, but yield erroneous or insufficient answers to the questions posed. There criteria serious shortcomings and inconsistencies in the structure and criteria of the work. In addition, the dissertation may be rejected during the preliminary examination or grading process due to research ethical reasons accessibility as academic fraud. All doctoral dissertations should dissertations the following scholarly criteria and they must:.