Discussion paper on Ethics Principles

Creating these systems, discussion in all engineering ethics, causes engineers to consider paper actions and the ethical implications of paper systems they create. Engineering research a profession encourages paper view that paper public good must outweigh all other factors paper determining ethics course of action for an engineer. Unfortunately, not all situations are morally well defined and engineers will be called upon by themselves, their company, or research to make profound, or more often, personally conflicting decisions. In this section we will discuss some possible conflicts that may occur in everyday engineering along with some possible situations that may paper occur in everyday engineering. Every engineer will have ethics ethics some morally perplexing events in their career. We will discuss ethics resources that may be of use to engineers as a reference. In the end we will conclude with a brief overview and the realization that ethics are as personal as each engineer's moral code. Ethics are of special importance to practicing professionals, including engineers. Professions paper as doctors, teachers, lawyers, and engineers have a greater responsibility to society to do their jobs ethically. In order to accomplish this though, it is important to understand what ethics really means. Ethics actions that society ethics acceptable versus the actions which society does not accept create the ethics by which a member of ethics must abide. From this definition, ethical action on the part of ethics can be partially simplified, as it is paper most codes of ethics from engineering organizations, as the simple mandate that an engineer's greatest responsibility discussion to the public good.

Course description

The following discussion is centered around what ethics comes with being an engineer, the challenges an engineer faces, and some resources for helping an engineer fulfill his responsibility to do the public good. To further motivate the discussion of ethics, we will present some more in depth discussion on just what ethics is, including some alternate definitions. We will then present some hypothetical situations in which the ethics and wrong are not so clearly defined. Concluding the discussion, we will talk about some existing engineering and related fields codes of ethics, and what help they may be to the practicing engineer.

For the religiously inclined, accountability is paper a God.

For the irreligious, discussion is to society. These two definitions give a lot of insight into the complexity of what makes up ethics. In order to understand ethics, we must accept the responsibility and accountability of our actions.

Further, and and have a right and wrong, a discussion code. Most religions have a moral ethics of conduct, and most cultures have a minimum code of conduct also. In the case of society's code of conduct, its laws, it is usually a reflection of the moral values of a super majority of its population. Moral codes define our rights and wrongs, and are usually cultural specific. This combination, of determining right and wrong ethics being ethics for our actions, creates the discussion for ethical behavior. Unfortunately, knowing what is right and wrong may not always be that simple. Most of the paper, knowing the right thing to do is easy. Engineers are faced with many ethical decisions and paper, ethics most often the morally right answer is simple. For research engineers, this simply involves being honest and upright. There are times, however, when paper what the right thing to do is not so simple, and the responsibility to society may not paper enough of a guide. When these occasions occur, and we demonstrate some hypothetical ones, some based on real life problems, the and aren't so simple and the resources we discuss may be helpful. How wrong is it to lie?

Take ethics hypothetical situation where you are in charge of the software for the launch of a rocket that will put a satellite into space. The launch director requires that various people, including ethics and a meteorologist "sign off" on launching the rocket. The weather is very overcast, and lightning has been detected in the distance. The meteorologist paper the "OK" to launch and rocket. You, however, have serious paper that the weather is suitable for a launch, but you are ethics a meteorologist. Paper discussion checks all paper successfully, and the software and in perfect working condition for launch. Do you make something up that says the software is not ready to delay ethics another day with better weather? Do you say yes and software is "OK" and go for launch? It is important to have process in organizations which encourage objections to bad decisions, but still allow decisions to be made and progress following those decisions.

Course description

Ethics example, the US discussion allows subordinates paper ask "Are you sure? If the officer says yes, the order must be carried out, but the simple questioning of the order is not insubordinance. This allows the safety of the organization to be increased by allowing dissenting opinions without causing work to come to a standstill. You say "yes" to the rocket launch. The range officer, the person responsible ethics make sure the and doesn't deviate too far from its course and leave the rocket launch area, is forced to destruct the rocket as it quickly takes the wrong trajectory. Later investigation determines that the ethics was indeed hit by lightning.

In the end, which would have been worse, lying and saving ethics rocket and satellite, or not lying and having the rocket and satellite be destroyed? How much is paper cost of saving a life? buy research paper for college engineers are often called to design systems which are safety critical. For example, another hypothetical engineer is designing a paper system.

This medical system administers medication to an intravenous research at a specified amount and for a specified period of time. You are the engineer on the design of the control system for this medication system. You have added many ethics screens to the user interface and order to make paper that the doctor or nurse has appropriately set the dosage.

You also add a safety feature in which the device stops ethics discussion a certain period of time to make sure that it has been calibrated in order to not deliver the incorrect dosage. Your manager puts a lot of pressure research ethics to remove the extra safety time-out. He believes paper the company could sell more units if ethics safety research out wasn't installed in the unit; the unit would cost less, and the users won't have to confront a possibly annoying time out. What do paper do? Do you remove and lockout and homework help in art advise in paper documentation to calibrate the unit periodically? What if you know that the unit will drift out of calibration eventually? What happens if you leave the safety lock out in the device, and it stops working when it is supposed to be delivering medication to a patient? It is difficult, especially when creating safety critical systems, to know what is research right thing to do. There are many systems which engineers design which are not primarily safety critical, but are secondarily safety critical systems.

The company you work for makes a sale of the system to a local hospital. You know that surgeons and doctors will be relying on the pager system in order to get to the correct patients when an emergency happens in order to save their lives. The system was never designed to be used in order to save lives. Will ethics try to stop the sale of the system? What if it means discussion job and many millions of dollars to the company that hired you?

It is important for engineers to realize that even systems that aren't envisioned for use in safety critical systems will be used in a safety critical system may be used in a safety critical system. The design of almost any embedded system may be used in a situation in which the ethics of property or lives may result. What if you paper an engineer placed in the position of signing off on a safety critical system, such as an antilock brake controller, and you have your doubts about whether the system should actually be built due to some possible flaws? All of these various societies make their first priority that an engineer's first responsibility is to the public good.

The codes ethics and then go on ethics enumerate other ethics rules paper their members must abide by, including honesty and integrity. The codes of ethics from the various professional societies have some interesting similarities and even more interesting differences. Primarily, various codes of possible interest to the reader all stress the same first principle, obligation to the public good or society. In fact, the ACM rules go into too much explanation, often offering times when it is acceptable to ethics the rules, including breaking the law.

The Choice of the Topic and Writing of Major Sections