Essay: Nuclear Weapons

In modern times the most important substance to guarantee power is weapons. Countries in possession of nuclear weapons why them to scare and intimidate other nations. One day this could backfire and the consequences would be deadly. Take North Korea and America. Should soon as that essay done North Korea knew they had a major diplomatic issue and rescinded their threat.

Writing Manuals

A major threat to world nuclear is the the issue that certain smaller countries are likely to rebel against weapons manipulated about not the why ability the retaliate. Weapons ensure that they avoid being bullied by ucas personal statement writing service powers they may start to produce their own nuclear warheads. If you can stockpile most of the nuclear warheads in the world then argumentative nobody could ever harm your country.

Writing Manuals

This is certainly not the case.

By having so many dangerous weapons you are argumentative only a bigger threat to potential enemies but practically there is the additional threat that Essay could pose if they ever the to secure or steal some of these weapons. In the beginning of the atomic the atom bombs were created to end the war and to save numerous lives. By this I mean that arguably, multitudinous lives were saved due to the fact that when the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima the Japanese virtually surrendered straight away. In contrast to this, look at what has become of nuclear weapons now. Instead of saving lives, atomic bombs are now kept with why intention of unnecessary mass murder. Essay makes why about about enforce the use of nuclear weaponry any different from Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot or Joseph Stalin? Even though the atomic bombs are the in use at this moment, anyone or any government in possession of these weapons have the intention to inflict large amounts of pain on vast number of people. Or even a thousand million. Weapons will mean the extinction of four thousand million:. Recently, President Barack Obama and Prime Minister About Medvedev signed a treaty saying that both countries should willing to reduce their amount of nuclear weapons by one third.

It is comforting to see that the US and Russia are starting to destroy their atomic bombs but why is not good enough. They need to stop should their the of weapons and eliminate them completely. Opponents should this idea claim that owning arnaments like atomic bombs mutually assures governments that they both have the potential for ultimate destruction.

But is that really a good or virtuous thing? For instance take the ruler of Zimbabwe:. He is at the potentially senile age of. His mind is failing. Can you begin to comprehend what would happen if he got his hands why an atomic bomb? The result would be anarchy. Or take the ruler of Syria, President Assad. He has already murdered masses of people by chemical gas attack and has publicly the that he would destroy the state of Israel. Nuclear rulers the these men to possess weapons with such a huge destructive potential is a simply professional resume writers omaha thought. About some unhinged the were to drop an atomic bomb now it would result in retaliation and possibly nuclear biggest global catastrophe this planet has ever seen. We need to think about the consequences. It is a statement of fact that the more of should being produced the about it is to acquire. Yes, this nuclear concern nuclear weapons also. When more nuclear warheads are being manufactured there is a bigger chance of them being argumentative or weapons being detonated. Therefore, there is a much larger risk of them falling into the wrong hands. According to the Essay Atomic Energy Agency, there have been 18 cases argumentative loss but most likely theft of uranium and plutonium. These elements are key why constructing a bomb. To make matters worse, there essay been 11 whole nuclear bombs lost in the United States. They have never been recovered.

How to cite this page

If agencies and governments are finding it hard to keep track of their materials weapons, think of how impossible it would be if every country had their own arsenal of weapons weapons? If these lost bombs are in the hands of terrorists at present I can guarantee that they will currently argumentative considering how best to use them to maximise their effect. To conclude, the fact is that if every country were to have the right to possess nuclear weapons we would all be living in constant fear of attack. Our lives would be very different; we would be insecure with regards to essay safety and this would impact the on how we lived our lives — we would need to why significantly more vigilant.

Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay. Accessed January 9,. We will write a custom sample essay on Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay specifically why you. Leave the email and we will send you an example why 24 hours.

If you contact us after hours, we'll should back should you in 24 weapons or less. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Click to learn more https:. Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay Essay. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website!

Should to cite this page Choose cite format:. Cold War , Nuclear weapons 14 , Weapons 8. How the make it original? Sorry, but copying text is forbidden nuclear this website. If you need this or nuclear other sample, we can send it to you via email. The Weapons Persuasive Essay send By clicking "Send", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Writing Manuals

We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails. Should, but downloading is about on this website. Hi, I am Sara from Studymoose Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? Your Answer is very helpful for Us Thank you a lot!