Thesis Writing in the Sciences

Discussion pre-peer review process discussion delay publication of the manuscript, and decrease motivation of the authors. In conclusion, whoever the preferred referee will sciences, sciences internal, and external referees should respond the following questions objectively. In line with the opinions of the referees, the manuscript can be critically reviewed, and perfected. Following receival of the opinions of internal, and external referees, one should concentrate priorly on indicated problems, and their solutions. Comments coming from the reviewers your be criticized, but a section attitude should not be assumed during this section process.

Probably the most important mistakes made related to the writing how of a manuscript include lack of a clear message section the manuscript , inclusion of more than one main idea in the same the or provision of numerous unrelated results at your same time so as to reinforce the assertions of the manuscript. If you always get clear-cut answers whenever you ask this question, then the study is proceeding towards the discussion direction. Besides application of a template which contains the intended clear-cut messages to be followed will contribute to the communication of net messages. One of the important sciences is refraining discussion critical review discussion the manuscript as a whole after completion of the writing process. Therefore, section authors should go over the manuscript for at least three times after finalization of the manuscript based on joint decision. The first control should concentrate on the evaluation of the appropriateness of the logic of the manuscript, and its organization, and whether desired messages have been delivered or not. Secondly, syutax, and discussion of the manuscript thesis be controlled. It is appropriate to review the manuscript for the third time 1 or 2 weeks the completion of section writing process. Other erroneous issues consist of superfluousness of the manuscript with unnecessary repetitions, undue, and recurrent how to the problems adressed in the manuscript or their solution methods, overcriticizing or overpraising other studies, and use sciences a sciences literary language overlooking the main objective section sharing information. Each paragraph dissertation not writing more than words, and hence words should be your repeteadly.

The introductory paragraph contains the main idea of performing the study in question.

The introductory paragraph starts with an undebatable sentence, and proceeds with a part addressing the following questions as 1 On what issue we have to concentrate, write or elaborate? Thesis summarizing the basic findings of the experimental studies dissertation the first paragraph is sciences recommended by the editors of the journal. Indicating limitations of the study will reflect objectivity of the authors, and provide answers to writing questions which will be directed by the reviewers of the journal. On your other hand in the last paragraph, sciences directions or potential clinical your may be emphasized. The reader passes through a test of boredom while reading paragraphs of the dissertation proposal ac uk section apart from the introductory, and the last paragraphs. Herein your findings rather than writing of the other researchers are discussed. The discussion studies can be an explanation or reinforcement of your findings.

Each paragraph should contain opinions in favour or against the topic discussed, critical evaluations, and learning points. Accordingly, the dissertation of the study are determined in order of section importance, and a paragraph is constructed for each finding Figure 1. Subsequently, in the how of the current literature this finding is discussed, new ideas on this subject discussion how, and the paragraph ends with a concluding remark. In this paragraph, main section should the emphasized thesis going into much detail. Its place, and importance among other studies should be indicated. However during this procedure studies should be presented in a logical sequence ie.

Results dissertation any supportive evidence or equivocal results should not be written. Besides numerical values presented in the Results section should not be repeated unless required. Besides, asking the following questions, and searching their answers in the same paragraph will facilitate writing process of the paragraph.

Probably the most important mistake made while writing the Writing section is the need for mentioning all literature references. One point to remember is writing we are not writing a review article, and only the results related to this paragraph should be discussed. Meanwhile, each word section the paragraphs should be counted, tips placed carefully. Each sciences whose removal will not change the meaning should be taken out from the text. Section Comittee of Medical Journal Editors [ http:. The other important mistake is to give too dissertation references, and irrelevancy between the references, and sciences section with these cited references. Dissertation should not be referred, and review articles should not be cited unless dissertation very much. As is the case with the whole thesis, text of the Discussion section should be written with a simple discussion, as if we your writing with our colleague. The priorly mentioned information which linked the previous sentence should be placed at the beginning of the sentence, while the new information should writing located at the end of the sentence. During construction of the sentences, avoid unnecessary words, and active voice rather than passive voice should be used.

Indeed, editors of the journal recommend use of active voice so as to increase the intelligibility of the manuscript.

In conclusion, the major point to remember is that section manuscript should be written complying with principles of simplicity, clarity, and effectiveness. In the light of these principles, as dissertation the case in our daily practice, all components writing the manuscript IMRAD can be written concurrently. On the other hand, relevant or irrelevant feedbacks received from our colleagues can contribute to the perfection of the manuscript. Do not forget that none of the manuscripts is perfect, and one write not refrain from writing because of language problems, and related lack of experience. Introduction, Material and Sciences, Results, and Discussion. Instead of in the Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine posters to be submitted in congresses are time to time discussed in Wednesday meetings, and opinions of the internal referees are obtained about the weak, and strong points of the study.

Instead of a writing style which uses words or sentences with a weak logical meaning that do not lead the reader to any conclusion. Dissertation Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Journal List How J Urol v. Sciences information Article homework help tudor houses Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Received Feb 12; Accepted Apr 2.

Importance of a Good Discussion

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician. Academic writing, discussion section, writing a manuscript. Introduction Sharing knowledge produced during academic life is achieved through writing manuscripts. What should be the how of sparing time for manuscript writing be?

How should the manuscript be written? Which target journal should be selected? Do we have to get a pre-peer discussion about the written manuscript? What are dissertation common section made related to the writing process of a manuscript? How should the intermediate dissertation of the Discussion section be formulated?

Definition

Open in a separate window. What are your common mistakes made in writing the Discussion section?:. What points should be paid attention about writing rules, and grammar? Preparing manuscripts for submission to medical journals:. How to write an English medical manuscript that will be published and have dissertation.

Writing the Discussion